Performance By Design

Processor performance in the age of multi-core: RISC vs. CISC, part 1. Reading Apple’s announcement in the news media and trade press about a plan to transition its next generation Mac computers from Intel-manufactured x64 processors to custom ARM chips prompted me to write a blog entry discussingApple’s strategy in greater depth and, hopefully, with more insight than the coverage of the move that published reports provided. An issue raised by one of the computer industry experts that analyzed the Apple announcement was that it might re-ignite an old debate among CPU hardware engineers with regard to the relative virtues of the CISC vs. RISC approaches to processor design. This seems very unlikely to me, and I will attempt to explain why in this post. Basically, RISC has won the engineering battle, but meanwhile Intel has good reasons to continue to resist any breaking changes in its hardware platform that would cause existing x86 and x64 software to fail. What is actually the most i

In late June, Apple announced plans to transition its next generation Mac computers from Intel-manufactured x64 processors to custom ARM chips, something which Apple has branded as “Apple Silicon,” highlighting the provenance of the new hardware. Later this year when the first Apple Silicon-based Macs begin to roll out, the company’s line of Mac portable and desktop computers will be using the same ARM processors that Apple is currently using in its iPhone and iPad  products. While there has been ample coverage of this news in the trade press, much of the commentary I have seen online from various technology pundits ( here is a representative sample analysis from one of these self-anointed experts) misses many key aspects of Apple’s recent decision. Apples’s move warrants a better and more complete analysis. In brief, moving off of Intel processors and on to ARM CPUs is not a huge deal, but it is a very smart move. What is fundamentally significant about the decision to switch to t